"Evolution"
(Speaker Amadio Bianchi, control by Gianfranco Lautieri)
Reality or appearance? Reality or appearance? Reality or appearance? Reality or appearance?
...past and future
are
into the present...
IF MAN WANTED TO GIVE A DIMENSION TO THE SUPREME ENTITY, HE COULD DO IT ONLY ACCORDING TO HIS CAPACITY OF KNOWLEDGE. ANY DEFINITION OF GOD HE COULD EXPRESS COULD ONLY BE A RELATIVE CONCEPT.
We can acknowledge space, but without God it wouldn’t be space: it would be nothing.
Space would be a concrete reality, nothing would be its opposite.
Into this space we could acknowledge the existence of an entity that we call Mother Element, with a finite or infinite number of particles in their basic form. These basic elements are in perfect balance or, all along, in a condition of evolutionary motion. In the first case, a variation of present values could take the particles off from their condition of balance, starting a transformation that we can call “evolution”. Evolution would presumptively be in operation all along, in the second case.
All the matter outside and inside us, made of Mother Element, would have acquired the actual structures through an evolution.
This evolution would be a motion, and we could, or could not, suppose an origin of it but we could not, only with the logic, ascertain its end.
Its direction would come out of the resultant of all present forces. The elementary particle would be the smallest part of God.
These particles would have the possibility to fuse each other, according to a finite or infinite number of ways, and to form, together with the space, the entire Universe.
It follows that the “whole” would be God and everything a part of it.
The elementary particle itself would not evolve, but the situations which particles give birth to would. These situations, characterized by the continue motion, maybe an irreversible motion, of evolution, would form the structure of the entire universe.
Only God would not evolve. The evolution would represent only a manifestation of Him.
Universe, as I told before, would be an association of entities in evolution, tightly connected and reciprocally influenced, with the Mother Element as their common denominator. This association, or maximum entity, would have its own motion, that we call general evolution, as a result of all evolutions of entities that create it. Every motion would act on the general one but in the same time would be influenced by it.
In a so mobile universe every situation would be unrepeatable.
The Mother Element particle itself, as I already told, would not evolve but, brought by circumstances to join another particle, it would form a “situation” that can evolve.
Generally, two entities that associate themselves, even if they are well separated, would form a third entity, which evolution would have a certain and reciprocal influence with the evolutionary motions of single entities. The beginning of this evolution, that we can call relative evolution, would only be apparent, because the same circumstances that favoured their association, now belong to it. Also the end would result apparent, because circumstances caused by evolution would hold good.
So, we would say that past and future are into the present.
Birth and death of a man would only be the apparent beginning and end of the typical relative evolution of a situation. Also man, like all other situations, would take part to the universal evolution with a evolutionary associated motion, and consequently a influenced motion, to the evolutions of all universe’s entities.
Consequently, man would be the subject-object of its own evolution without being its creator.
TRYING TO COMMUNICATE OUR THOUGHTS, WE BECAME AWARE OF THE EVOLUTION OF OUR ORIGINAL IDEA. BY ACQUIRING EXPERIENCE, THROUGH OUR REASONING, WE OFTEN FELT FORCED TO REVIEW SOME CONCEPT. WE DEEPLY FELT THE PRESENCE OF THAT MOTION THAT WE BELIEVE CHARACTERIZES THE UNIVERSE. WE ARE AWARE OF OUR IMPOSSIBILITY TO PRODUCE A COMPLETE IDEA THAT COULD STAY ABSOLUTELY MOTIONLESS. WE REALIZED TO GIVE TO THE READER ONLY A CIRCUMSTANCE.
Reality or appearance? Reality or appearance? Reality or appearance? Reality or appearance?